The past week end and today (Monday) 10m has shown it good side, propagation wise.
I was able to work into 5 continents : Europe (Doh ! - local), Asia, Africa, South America, and - finally, since I got re-started on radio activity, North America.
However, there was a down side this past week end : The Worked All Germany contest was running for 24 hours. This just means that Germans were not workable on 10m from here, and everyone else **only** wanted to work with German stations. 24 hours with essentially no contact possible.
Now, the up side is that it was absolutely "loud and clear" that 10m propagation was present all during the daytime, and a bit into the early evening. This is the advantage of having contests. Now, if the contest would have been everyone working everyone, I would have been really happy because I would have been able to participate fully on the band. I look forward to a week end with a non selective contest and good 10m propagation.
Oh yes, there *was* a non selective contest running, the Ten-Ten International QSO party or so, but that activity drowned completely in the big one, even on 10m. It was running 48 hours, but the activity in that one was very low, outside the German one.
Amateur radio and other radio related activities of OZ9QV, and more...
2015-10-19
2015-10-07
10 and 6 today : Aurora(l) E
So - today was a poor day for HF propagation, we have a major magnetic storm going on, so signals are down, bands closed or almost closed.
Well, even with my 3 band vertical for 6m/2m/70cm I could hear aurora signals for a little while. people not far away have been seeing the Aurora Borealis, a.k.a. Northern Lights.
Enter 10m : An otherwise closed band, it would seem, until a signal popped out of the noise, quite strongly. Local ? No, it came from Northern Norway (Narvik).
I was able to work a few stations in Northern Norway and Finland, I took to calling CQ for a while, and two OH stations came back. Not bad for an otherwise dead band.
Yes, I am aware that this can occur during auroras, so it is nice to see that there is also activity.
Morale : Never give up on 10m and 6m. Those bands have the magic of opening at unexpected times to unexpected places - well, sometimes.
Well, even with my 3 band vertical for 6m/2m/70cm I could hear aurora signals for a little while. people not far away have been seeing the Aurora Borealis, a.k.a. Northern Lights.
Enter 10m : An otherwise closed band, it would seem, until a signal popped out of the noise, quite strongly. Local ? No, it came from Northern Norway (Narvik).
I was able to work a few stations in Northern Norway and Finland, I took to calling CQ for a while, and two OH stations came back. Not bad for an otherwise dead band.
Yes, I am aware that this can occur during auroras, so it is nice to see that there is also activity.
Morale : Never give up on 10m and 6m. Those bands have the magic of opening at unexpected times to unexpected places - well, sometimes.
2015-10-05
Antenna testing.
Today was the first time I tried out my RigExpert antenna analyzer. What a neat instrument.
I am in the process of tuning a multiband dipole for the HF bands. Still not finished, but using the analyzer to see the SWR curve (or Smith chart, or R and X) makes antenna construction so much easier.
The process is not yet finished, but I have, at least seen that I can operate in the full CW bands of 15 and 20m without an antenna tuner, and about 50 kHz of the 80m band as well. The rest is still to be adjusted. When the adjustment is complete I expect to be able to operate on the full 15m and a good part of the 20m band without using a tuner.
The antenna is a bit low in resonance frequency, probably because of the low height of the end points. I think that it will become possible to operate most of the 40m CW band without tuner. The rest of the old bands (80/40/20/15/10) will need the assistance of a simple tuner.
On the other hand, my 10m half wave vertical provided a rather interesting result. Two minimum SWR points on 27.7 and 28.6 MHz. I suspect that one is the real resonance frequency of the antenna, and the other appears due to some accidental matching provided by the cable length used. More test to follow on that. The end result is that the antenna is below SWR 1.5 from 26.9 to 29.7 MHz.
A very universally applicable antenna.
Later some more experiments are in order.
One thing I do want to test is making antennas less obtrusive. A shining half wave aluminium vertical is rather visible when seen on the background of trees, and when it stands on a surplus military mast (yes, green) it looks like it is floating in the air.
I am looking for a paint for metal antennas that will not deteriorate the performance, at least very little. Any ideas. I will be looking up paint on the net in the next few days, but any input is appreciated.
For now I have a paint mix that should be tested with a simple 2m aluminium dipole, now that my test equipment is coming into operation, albeit slowly.
One more thing I have to look into, is guy wires that are less obtrusive than the white flag lines that are more generally available, along with having high strength and good insulation properties.
I am in the process of tuning a multiband dipole for the HF bands. Still not finished, but using the analyzer to see the SWR curve (or Smith chart, or R and X) makes antenna construction so much easier.
The process is not yet finished, but I have, at least seen that I can operate in the full CW bands of 15 and 20m without an antenna tuner, and about 50 kHz of the 80m band as well. The rest is still to be adjusted. When the adjustment is complete I expect to be able to operate on the full 15m and a good part of the 20m band without using a tuner.
The antenna is a bit low in resonance frequency, probably because of the low height of the end points. I think that it will become possible to operate most of the 40m CW band without tuner. The rest of the old bands (80/40/20/15/10) will need the assistance of a simple tuner.
On the other hand, my 10m half wave vertical provided a rather interesting result. Two minimum SWR points on 27.7 and 28.6 MHz. I suspect that one is the real resonance frequency of the antenna, and the other appears due to some accidental matching provided by the cable length used. More test to follow on that. The end result is that the antenna is below SWR 1.5 from 26.9 to 29.7 MHz.
A very universally applicable antenna.
Later some more experiments are in order.
One thing I do want to test is making antennas less obtrusive. A shining half wave aluminium vertical is rather visible when seen on the background of trees, and when it stands on a surplus military mast (yes, green) it looks like it is floating in the air.
I am looking for a paint for metal antennas that will not deteriorate the performance, at least very little. Any ideas. I will be looking up paint on the net in the next few days, but any input is appreciated.
For now I have a paint mix that should be tested with a simple 2m aluminium dipole, now that my test equipment is coming into operation, albeit slowly.
One more thing I have to look into, is guy wires that are less obtrusive than the white flag lines that are more generally available, along with having high strength and good insulation properties.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)